On Thu, 2022-12-08 at 17:39 +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
>
> On 12/6/2022 5:44 PM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 21:11 +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> > > On 11/30/2022 1:07 AM, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> > > > SEV-ES guests don't use IRET interception for the detection of
> > > > an end of a NMI.
> > > >
> > > > Therefore it makes sense to create a wrapper to avoid repeating
> > > > the check for the SEV-ES.
> > > >
> > > > No functional change is intended.
> > > >
> > > > Suggested-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> > > > 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > > > index 512b2aa21137e2..cfed6ab29c839a 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> > > > @@ -2468,16 +2468,29 @@ static int task_switch_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > has_error_code, error_code);
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > +static void svm_disable_iret_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm))
> > > > + svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > > > +static void svm_enable_iret_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
> > > > +{
> > > > + if (!sev_es_guest(svm->vcpu.kvm))
> > > > + svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
> > > > +}
> > > > +
> > >
> > > nits:
> > > s/_iret_interception / _iret_intercept
> > > does that make sense?
> >
> > Makes sense. I can also move this to svm.h near the svm_set_intercept(), I think
> > it better a better place for this function there if no objections.
> >
> I think current approach is fine since function used in svm.c only. but I have
> no strong opinion on moving to svm.h either ways.
I also think so, just noticed something in case there are any objections.
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
>
> Thanks,
> Santosh
>
> > Best regards,
> > Maxim Levitsky
> > > Thanks,
> > > Santosh
> > >
> > > > static int iret_interception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > {
> > > > struct vcpu_svm *svm = to_svm(vcpu);
> > > >
> > > > ++vcpu->stat.nmi_window_exits;
> > > > svm->awaiting_iret_completion = true;
> > > > - if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm)) {
> > > > - svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
> > > > +
> > > > + svm_disable_iret_interception(svm);
> > > > + if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > > > svm->nmi_iret_rip = kvm_rip_read(vcpu);
> > > > - }
> > > > +
> > > > kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_EVENT, vcpu);
> > > > return 1;
> > > > }
> > > > @@ -3470,8 +3483,7 @@ static void svm_inject_nmi(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > return;
> > > >
> > > > svm->nmi_masked = true;
> > > > - if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > > > - svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
> > > > + svm_enable_iret_interception(svm);
> > > > ++vcpu->stat.nmi_injections;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > @@ -3614,12 +3626,10 @@ static void svm_set_nmi_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool masked)
> > > >
> > > > if (masked) {
> > > > svm->nmi_masked = true;
> > > > - if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > > > - svm_set_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
> > > > + svm_enable_iret_interception(svm);
> > > > } else {
> > > > svm->nmi_masked = false;
> > > > - if (!sev_es_guest(vcpu->kvm))
> > > > - svm_clr_intercept(svm, INTERCEPT_IRET);
> > > > + svm_disable_iret_interception(svm);
> > > > }
> > > > }
> > > >
