Re: [PATCH v6 08/19] iommufd: PFN handling for iopt_pages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/30/2022 4:29 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
+#ifndef __IO_PAGETABLE_H
+#define __IO_PAGETABLE_H
+
+#include <linux/interval_tree.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/kref.h>
+#include <linux/xarray.h>
+
+#include "iommufd_private.h"
+
+struct iommu_domain;
+
+/*
+ * Each io_pagetable is composed of intervals of areas which cover regions of
+ * the iova that are backed by something. iova not covered by areas is not
+ * populated in the page table. Each area is fully populated with pages.
+ *
+ * iovas are in byte units, but must be iopt->iova_alignment aligned.
+ *
+ * pages can be NULL, this means some other thread is still working on setting
+ * up or tearing down the area. When observed under the write side of the
+ * domain_rwsem a NULL pages must mean the area is still being setup and no
+ * domains are filled.
+ *
+ * storage_domain points at an arbitrary iommu_domain that is holding the PFNs
+ * for this area. It is locked by the pages->mutex. This simplifies the locking
+ * as the pages code can rely on the storage_domain without having to get the
+ * iopt->domains_rwsem.
+ *
+ * The io_pagetable::iova_rwsem protects node
+ * The iopt_pages::mutex protects pages_node
+ * iopt and immu_prot

typo, immu_prot -> iommu_prot


  are immutable

+
+/*
+ * Carry means we carry a portion of the final hugepage over to the front of the
+ * batch
+ */
+static void batch_clear_carry(struct pfn_batch *batch, unsigned int keep_pfns)
+{
+	if (!keep_pfns)
+		return batch_clear(batch);
+
+	batch->total_pfns = keep_pfns;
+	batch->npfns[0] = keep_pfns;
+	batch->pfns[0] = batch->pfns[batch->end - 1] +
+			 (batch->npfns[batch->end - 1] - keep_pfns);

The range of the skip_pfns is checked in batch_skip_carry, should keep_pfns also be checked in this function?


+	batch->end = 0;
+}
+
+static void batch_skip_carry(struct pfn_batch *batch, unsigned int skip_pfns)
+{
+	if (!batch->total_pfns)
+		return;
+	skip_pfns = min(batch->total_pfns, skip_pfns);

Should use batch->npfns[0] instead of batch->total_pfns?



+	batch->pfns[0] += skip_pfns;
+	batch->npfns[0] -= skip_pfns;
+	batch->total_pfns -= skip_pfns;
+}
+
+static int __batch_init(struct pfn_batch *batch, size_t max_pages, void *backup,
+			size_t backup_len)
+{
+	const size_t elmsz = sizeof(*batch->pfns) + sizeof(*batch->npfns);
+	size_t size = max_pages * elmsz;
+
+	batch->pfns = temp_kmalloc(&size, backup, backup_len);
+	if (!batch->pfns)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+	batch->array_size = size / elmsz;
+	batch->npfns = (u32 *)(batch->pfns + batch->array_size);
+	batch_clear(batch);
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int batch_init(struct pfn_batch *batch, size_t max_pages)
+{
+	return __batch_init(batch, max_pages, NULL, 0);
+}
+
+static void batch_init_backup(struct pfn_batch *batch, size_t max_pages,
+			      void *backup, size_t backup_len)
+{
+	__batch_init(batch, max_pages, backup, backup_len);
+}
+
+static void batch_destroy(struct pfn_batch *batch, void *backup)
+{
+	if (batch->pfns != backup)
+		kfree(batch->pfns);
+}
+
+/* true if the pfn could be added, false otherwise */

It is not accurate to use "could be" here because returning ture means the pfn has been added.


+static bool batch_add_pfn(struct pfn_batch *batch, unsigned long pfn)
+{
+	const unsigned int MAX_NPFNS = type_max(typeof(*batch->npfns));
+
+	if (batch->end &&
+	    pfn == batch->pfns[batch->end - 1] + batch->npfns[batch->end - 1] &&
+	    batch->npfns[batch->end - 1] != MAX_NPFNS) {
+		batch->npfns[batch->end - 1]++;
+		batch->total_pfns++;
+		return true;
+	}
+	if (batch->end == batch->array_size)
+		return false;
+	batch->total_pfns++;
+	batch->pfns[batch->end] = pfn;
+	batch->npfns[batch->end] = 1;
+	batch->end++;
+	return true;
+}
+
+/*
+ * Fill the batch with pfns from the domain. When the batch is full, or it
+ * reaches last_index, the function will return. The caller should use
+ * batch->total_pfns to determine the starting point for the next iteration.
+ */
+static void batch_from_domain(struct pfn_batch *batch,
+			      struct iommu_domain *domain,
+			      struct iopt_area *area, unsigned long start_index,
+			      unsigned long last_index)
+{
+	unsigned int page_offset = 0;
+	unsigned long iova;
+	phys_addr_t phys;
+
+	iova = iopt_area_index_to_iova(area, start_index);
+	if (start_index == iopt_area_index(area))
+		page_offset = area->page_offset;
+	while (start_index <= last_index) {
+		/*
+		 * This is pretty slow, it would be nice to get the page size
+		 * back from the driver, or have the driver directly fill the
+		 * batch.
+		 */
+		phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain, iova) - page_offset;

seems no need to handle the page_offset, since PHYS_PFN(phys) is used in batch_add_pfn below?



+		if (!batch_add_pfn(batch, PHYS_PFN(phys)))
+			return;
+		iova += PAGE_SIZE - page_offset;
+		page_offset = 0;
+		start_index++;
+	}
+}
+
+static struct page **raw_pages_from_domain(struct iommu_domain *domain,
+					   struct iopt_area *area,
+					   unsigned long start_index,
+					   unsigned long last_index,
+					   struct page **out_pages)
+{
+	unsigned int page_offset = 0;
+	unsigned long iova;
+	phys_addr_t phys;
+
+	iova = iopt_area_index_to_iova(area, start_index);
+	if (start_index == iopt_area_index(area))
+		page_offset = area->page_offset;
+	while (start_index <= last_index) {
+		phys = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain, iova) - page_offset;

ditto, since only PHYS_PFN(phys) is actually used, no need to handle page_offset



+		*(out_pages++) = pfn_to_page(PHYS_PFN(phys));
+		iova += PAGE_SIZE - page_offset;
+		page_offset = 0;
+		start_index++;
+	}
+	return out_pages;
+}
+
+/* Continues reading a domain until we reach a discontiguity

typo, discontiguity -> discontinuity


  in the pfns. */
+static void batch_from_domain_continue(struct pfn_batch *batch,
+				       struct iommu_domain *domain,
+				       struct iopt_area *area,
+				       unsigned long start_index,
+				       unsigned long last_index)
+{
+	unsigned int array_size = batch->array_size;
+
+	batch->array_size = batch->end;
+	batch_from_domain(batch, domain, area, start_index, last_index);
+	batch->array_size = array_size;
+}
+

BTW, this is a quite big patch, maybe break into smaller ones?





[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux