Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/24/2010 12:13 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> I see. Won't we hit the same issue when we call pic functions from
>>> atomic context during the guest entry sequence?
>>>
>>>
>> If there are such call paths, for sure. What concrete path(s) do you
>> have in mind?
>>
>>
>
> vcpu_enter_guest() -> inject_pending_event() ->
> kvm_cpu_{has,get}_interrupt() -> various pic functions if you're unlucky.
But do they kick anyone or just check/pull information? Never saw any
warnings during my tests last year (granted: with older -rt and kvm
versions).
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
