On Fri, Dec 02, 2022 at 02:49:09PM +0800, Chao Peng wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 06:16:46PM -0800, Vishal Annapurve wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 8:18 AM Chao Peng <chao.p.peng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> ...
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +SYSCALL_DEFINE1(memfd_restricted, unsigned int, flags)
> > > +{
> >
> > Looking at the underlying shmem implementation, there seems to be no
> > way to enable transparent huge pages specifically for restricted memfd
> > files.
> >
> > Michael discussed earlier about tweaking
> > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/shmem_enabled setting to allow
> > hugepages to be used while backing restricted memfd. Such a change
> > will affect the rest of the shmem usecases as well. Even setting the
> > shmem_enabled policy to "advise" wouldn't help unless file based
> > advise for hugepage allocation is implemented.
>
> Had a look at fadvise() and looks it does not support HUGEPAGE for any
> filesystem yet.
Yes, I think fadvise() is the right direction here. The problem is similar
to NUMA policy where existing APIs are focused around virtual memory
addresses. We need to extend ABI to take fd+offset as input instead.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
