Re: [PATCH v6 19/19] iommufd: Add a selftest

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 06:18:34PM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
> Hi Jason,
> 
> On 11/30/22 14:51, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 03:14:32PM +0800, Yi Liu wrote:
> >> On 2022/11/30 04:29, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> >>> Cover the essential functionality of the iommufd with a directed test from
> >>> userspace. This aims to achieve reasonable functional coverage using the
> >>> in-kernel self test framework.
> >>>
> >>> A second test does a failure injection sweep of the success paths to study
> >>> error unwind behaviors.
> >>>
> >>> This allows achieving high coverage of the corner cases in pages.c.
> >>>
> >>> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Tested-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> # s390
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> with sudo echo 4 > /proc/sys/vm/nr_hugepages
> >>
> >> Both "sudo ./iommufd" and "sudo ./iommufd_fail_nth" works on my
> >> side.
> > It is interesting that you need that, my VM doesn't, I wonder what the
> > difference is
> 
> That's the same on my end, I need at least 2 hugepages to get all tests
> passing.
> Otherwise
> # FAILED: 113 / 121 tests passed.
> # Totals: pass:113 fail:8 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> 
> I think you should add this in the commit msg + also the fact that
> CONFIG_IOMMUFD_TEST is required

Done, thanks

Jason



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux