On 11/28/22 12:43, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 12:01:06PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote: >>>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h >>>> index e9e387caffac..5ead9e997510 100644 >>>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h >>>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h >>>> @@ -2403,7 +2403,7 @@ static inline void pgtable_pte_page_dtor(struct page *page) >>>> >>>> #if USE_SPLIT_PMD_PTLOCKS >>>> >>>> -static struct page *pmd_pgtable_page(pmd_t *pmd) >>>> +static inline struct page *pmd_pgtable_page(pmd_t *pmd) >>>> { >>>> unsigned long mask = ~(PTRS_PER_PMD * sizeof(pmd_t) - 1); >>>> return virt_to_page((void *)((unsigned long) pmd & mask)); >>> >>> This chunk does not appear to belong to this patch. >> >> Should not this helper be made a 'static inline' before using it else where ? > > Probably yes, but it is not kvm s390-specific change. Right, just that the s390 change here is the first instance where this helper is being used outside the header, hence kept them together. > > I guess, you wanted to make it together or as a follow-up to this one? > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221124131641.1523772-1-anshuman.khandual@xxxxxxx/ > Unless too much trouble, could we just keep it here as proposed.