Re: [PATCH v4 09/16] KVM: arm64: PMU: Do not let AArch32 change the counters' top 32 bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Marc,

On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 8:38 AM Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Even when using PMUv3p5 (which implies 64bit counters), there is
> no way for AArch32 to write to the top 32 bits of the counters.
> The only way to influence these bits (other than by counting
> events) is by writing PMCR.P==1.
>
> Make sure we obey the architecture and preserve the top 32 bits
> on a counter update.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>  1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index ea0c8411641f..419e5e0a13d0 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -119,13 +119,8 @@ u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx)
>         return counter;
>  }
>
> -/**
> - * kvm_pmu_set_counter_value - set PMU counter value
> - * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> - * @select_idx: The counter index
> - * @val: The counter value
> - */
> -void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
> +static void kvm_pmu_set_counter(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val,
> +                               bool force)
>  {
>         u64 reg;
>
> @@ -135,12 +130,36 @@ void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
>         kvm_pmu_release_perf_event(&vcpu->arch.pmu.pmc[select_idx]);
>
>         reg = counter_index_to_reg(select_idx);
> +
> +       if (vcpu_mode_is_32bit(vcpu) && select_idx != ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX &&
> +           !force) {
> +               /*
> +                * Even with PMUv3p5, AArch32 cannot write to the top
> +                * 32bit of the counters. The only possible course of
> +                * action is to use PMCR.P, which will reset them to
> +                * 0 (the only use of the 'force' parameter).
> +                */
> +               val  = lower_32_bits(val);
> +               val |= upper_32_bits(__vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg));

Shouldn't the result of upper_32_bits() be shifted 32bits left
before ORing (to maintain the upper 32bits of the current value) ?

Thank you,
Reiji

> +       }
> +
>         __vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, reg) = val;
>
>         /* Recreate the perf event to reflect the updated sample_period */
>         kvm_pmu_create_perf_event(vcpu, select_idx);
>  }
>
> +/**
> + * kvm_pmu_set_counter_value - set PMU counter value
> + * @vcpu: The vcpu pointer
> + * @select_idx: The counter index
> + * @val: The counter value
> + */
> +void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val)
> +{
> +       kvm_pmu_set_counter(vcpu, select_idx, val, false);
> +}
> +
>  /**
>   * kvm_pmu_release_perf_event - remove the perf event
>   * @pmc: The PMU counter pointer
> @@ -533,7 +552,7 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val)
>                 unsigned long mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu);
>                 mask &= ~BIT(ARMV8_PMU_CYCLE_IDX);
>                 for_each_set_bit(i, &mask, 32)
> -                       kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(vcpu, i, 0);
> +                       kvm_pmu_set_counter(vcpu, i, 0, true);
>         }
>  }
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux