On Wed, Nov 16, 2022 at 10:10:58AM -0700, Peter Gonda wrote: > I think another comment above the first snp_issue_guest_request() > could help too. Saying once we call this function we either need to > increment the sequence number or wipe the VMPCK to ensure the > encryption scheme is safe. And make that explicit pls: /* * If the extended guest request fails due to having to small of a * certificate data buffer retry the same guest request without the * extended data request... ... in order to not have to reuse the IV. I have to admit, the flow in that function is still not optimal but I haven't stared at it long enough to have a better idea... Thx. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)