> > > Well, the entire point of the warning that you are disabling here is > > > to catch potential CFI failures at compile time, rather than run > > > time :) > > > > Oh, of course I didn't intend to be opposed to CFI. > > Oh, I apologize if I gave the impression that you were, I did not mean to put > words in your mouth! I was just giving additional context as to why we have > that warning enable and how we use it to help catch potential run time failures > at compile time, which does not require running CFI to keep CFI happy. No, I don't feel impression at all :), maybe just a little bit upset that I didn't realize it at the beginning. I actually appreciate you provided additional context into this thread. Xin
