Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 02/19/2010 11:03 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Actually, I'm still in favor of proper (Sea)BIOS support for virtio and >> scsi, either via the paravirt port 0x405 and its qemu backend or via >> minimalistic support of the hardware directly in the BIOS. That would >> free us from all those hooking and unhooking dances at least. >> >> Kevin, Anthony, and all others: what is now the merge road map for the >> bootable scsi/virtio feature? >> > > Stefan posted a virtio-blk driver for gPXE. I like this approach > because it's generally useful (gPXE can be used with any BIOS). Does it allow a unified boot device selection, one menu for them all, no more "boot=on" workarounds? > > For the LSI SCSI adapter, I'm not really sure the best way forward. > Honestly, it's so broken currently, I'm not sure booting really matters. Well, we are successfully using this "broken" adapter. What is not working? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
