H. Peter Anvin wrote: > Jan Kiszka wrote: >> Actually, I'm still in favor of proper (Sea)BIOS support for virtio and >> scsi, either via the paravirt port 0x405 and its qemu backend or via >> minimalistic support of the hardware directly in the BIOS. That would >> free us from all those hooking and unhooking dances at least. >> > > The *proper* thing is to support BBS in SeaBIOS - that way your device > drivers just hook in through the standard BEV/BCV mechanism (which > should be used by *all* the device drivers, including the internal ones.) If there is standard for this, even better. On first glance, it doesn't look like a specification monster. Still some work to do. Or are there already activities in this direction? If not let us fix the issue ad-hoc until we have full BBS. Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
