Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 5:48 AM Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Vipin Sharma <vipinsh@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: >> >> > Make guest OS ID calculation common to all hyperv tests and similar to >> > hv_generate_guest_id(). >> >> A similar (but without hv_linux_guest_id()) patch is present in my >> Hyper-V TLB flush update: >> >> https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20221101145426.251680-32-vkuznets@xxxxxxxxxx/ >> > > After getting feedback from David, I decided to remove > LINUX_VERSION_CODE in v2. Our patches are functionally identical now. > > @Sean, Paolo, Vitaly > Should I be rebasing my v2 on top of TLB flush patch series and remove > patch 4 and 5 from my series? I am not sure how these situations are > handled. > > @Vitaly > Are you planning to send v14? > > If yes, then for v13 Patch 31 (KVM: selftests: Move HYPERV_LINUX_OS_ID > definition to a common header) will you keep it same or will you > modify it to add HYPERV_LINUX_OS_ID in hyperv_clock.c and > hyperv_svm_test.c? > > If not, then I can add a patch in my series to change those two files > if I end up rebasing on top of your series. > Rumor has it that v13 is going to be merged to kvm/queue soon so I have no plans for v14 at this point. Fingers crossed) -- Vitaly
