Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm
From: Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 15:51:57 +0100
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@xxxxxxxxxx>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@xxxxxxxxxx>, kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1266493115-28386-10-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>
References: <1266493115-28386-1-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx> <1266493115-28386-10-git-send-email-joerg.roedel@xxxxxxx>

On 18.02.2010, at 12:38, Joerg Roedel wrote:

> TDB.

TDB? That's not a patch description.


Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm
  - From: Avi Kivity

References:
- [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup)
  - From: Joerg Roedel
- [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm
  - From: Joerg Roedel

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup)
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Nested SVM fixes (and Win7-64bit bringup)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] KVM: SVM: Make lazy FPU switching work with nested svm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [KVM ARM] [KVM ia64] [KVM ppc] [Virtualization Tools] [Spice Development] [Libvirt] [Libvirt Users] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Questions] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86]

Powered by Linux