On 11/4/22 11:53, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 11/4/22 11:16, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 11/4/22 07:32, Thomas Huth wrote:
On 03/11/2022 18.01, Pierre Morel wrote:
Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 127
+++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
-EMISSINGPATCHDESCRIPTION
... please add some words *why* this is a good idea / necessary.
I saw that the i386 patch had no description for the same patch so...
To be honest I do not know why it is necessary.
The only reason I see is to be in sync with the PC implementation.
So what about:
"
Register TYPE_S390_CCW_MACHINE properties as class properties
to be conform with the X architectures
"
?
@Cédric , any official recommendation for doing that?
There was a bunch of commits related to QOM in this series :
91def7b83 arm/virt: Register most properties as class properties
f5730c69f0 i386: Register feature bit properties as class properties
which moved property definitions at the class level.
Then,
commit d8fb7d0969 ("vl: switch -M parsing to keyval")
changed machine_help_func() to use a machine class and not machine
instance anymore.
I would use the same kind of commit log and add a Fixes tag to get it
merged in 7.2
With that,
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <clg@xxxxxxxx>
Thanks,
C.
OK,
Thanks,
Pierre
--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen
