On Thu, 2022-09-29 at 13:20 -0400, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> If CONFIG_KVM_SMM is not defined HF_SMM_MASK will always be zero, and
> we can spare userspace the hassle of setting up the SMRAM address space
> simply by reporting that only one address space is supported.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 13 ++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index cb88da02d965..d11697504471 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -1994,11 +1994,14 @@ enum {
> #define HF_SMM_MASK (1 << 6)
> #define HF_SMM_INSIDE_NMI_MASK (1 << 7)
>
> -#define __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE
> -#define KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM 2
> -
> -#define kvm_arch_vcpu_memslots_id(vcpu) ((vcpu)->arch.hflags & HF_SMM_MASK ? 1 : 0)
> -#define kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, role) __kvm_memslots(kvm, (role).smm)
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KVM_SMM
> +# define __KVM_VCPU_MULTIPLE_ADDRESS_SPACE
> +# define KVM_ADDRESS_SPACE_NUM 2
> +# define kvm_arch_vcpu_memslots_id(vcpu) ((vcpu)->arch.hflags & HF_SMM_MASK ? 1 : 0)
> +# define kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, role) __kvm_memslots(kvm, (role).smm)
> +#else
> +# define kvm_memslots_for_spte_role(kvm, role) __kvm_memslots(kvm, 0)
> +#endif
>
> #define KVM_ARCH_WANT_MMU_NOTIFIER
>
Reviewed-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Maxim Levitsky
