On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, Vasant Karasulli wrote: > Hi Sean, > > > Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > lib/x86/setup.c | 20 ++++++++++++-------- > > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/lib/x86/setup.c b/lib/x86/setup.c > > > index 7df0256..712e292 100644 > > > --- a/lib/x86/setup.c > > > +++ b/lib/x86/setup.c > > > @@ -192,8 +192,6 @@ static void setup_segments64(void) > > > write_gs(KERNEL_DS); > > > write_ss(KERNEL_DS); > > > > > > - /* Setup percpu base */ > > > - wrmsr(MSR_GS_BASE, (u64)&__percpu_data[pre_boot_apic_id()]); > > > > > > /* > > > * Update the code segment by putting it on the stack before the return > > > @@ -322,7 +320,7 @@ efi_status_t setup_efi(efi_bootinfo_t *efi_bootinfo) > > > } > > > return status; > > > } > > > - > > > + > > > > Huh. This causes a conflict for me. My local repo has a tab here that is > > presumably being removed, but this patch doesn't have anything. If I manually > > add back the tab, all is well. I suspect your client may be stripping trailing > > whitespace. > > Yes, I think my client was stripping trailing whitespaces. Do you want me > to send a new version of the patch with that formatting? No need, I'll put together a KUT PULL request next unless Paolo beats me to the punch.
