Re: [PATCH 5/6] KVM: selftests: memslot_perf_test: Consolidate memory sizes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/18/22 6:08 AM, Sean Christopherson wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2022, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
+#define MEM_EXTRA_SIZE		0x10000

Also, an expression like "(64 << 10)" is more readable than a "1"
with a tail of zeroes (it's easy to add one zero too many or be one
zero short).

+1 to not open coding raw numbers.

I think it's high time KVM selftests add #defines for the common sizes, e.g. SIZE_4KB,
16KB, 64K, 2MB, 1GB, etc...

Alternatively (or in addition), just #define 1KB, 1MB, 1GB, and 1TB, and then do
math off of those.


Ok. I will have one separate patch to define those sizes in kvm_util_base.h,
right after '#define NSEC_PER_SEC 1000000000L'. Sean, could you let me know
if it looks good to you?

    #define KB         (1UL << 10)
    #define MB         (1UL << 20)
    #define GB         (1UL << 30)
    #define TB         (1UL << 40)

    /* Base page and huge page size */
    #define SIZE_4KB   (  4 * KB)
    #define SIZE_16KB  ( 16 * KB)
    #define SIZE_64KB  ( 64 * KB)
    #define SIZE_2MB   (  2 * MB)
    #define SIZE_32MB  ( 32 * MB)
    #define SIZE_512MB (512 * MB)
    #define SIZE_1GB   (  1 * GB)
    #define SIZE_16GB  ( 16 * GB)

Thanks,
Gavin




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux