On 10/11/22 09:21, Pierre Morel wrote:
On 9/28/22 18:28, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 9/28/22 18:16, Pierre Morel wrote:
More thinking about this I will drop this patch for backward compatibility and in topology masks treat CPUs as being cores*threads
yes. You never know, people might have set threads=2 in their
domain file (like me). You could give the user a warning though,
with warn_report().
More thinking, I come back to the first idea after Daniel comment and protect the change with a new machine type version.
yes. That would be another machine class attribute to set in the new machine,
may be 'max_threads' to compare with the user provided value.
C.
Thanks,
C.
