Re: [PATCH v9 01/10] s390x/cpus: Make absence of multithreading clear

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/11/22 09:21, Pierre Morel wrote:


On 9/28/22 18:28, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 9/28/22 18:16, Pierre Morel wrote:
More thinking about this I will drop this patch for backward compatibility and in topology masks treat CPUs as being cores*threads

yes. You never know, people might have set threads=2 in their
domain file (like me). You could give the user a warning though,
with warn_report().

More thinking, I come back to the first idea after Daniel comment and protect the change with a new machine type version.

yes. That would be another machine class attribute to set in the new machine,
may be 'max_threads' to compare with the user provided value.

C.




Thanks,

C.








[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux