On 9/9/22 12:44, Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito wrote:
And make kvm_set_memory_region static, since it is not used outside
kvm_main.c
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 --
virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 11 +++++------
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
index 3b40f8d68fbb..1c5b7b2e35dd 100644
--- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
+++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
@@ -1108,8 +1108,6 @@ enum kvm_mr_change {
KVM_MR_FLAGS_ONLY,
};
-int kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem);
int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem);
void kvm_arch_free_memslot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot);
diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
index da263c370d00..339de0ed4557 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -2007,24 +2007,23 @@ int __kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__kvm_set_memory_region);
-int kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
- const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
+static int kvm_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
+ const struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
{
int r;
+ if ((u16)mem->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
mutex_lock(&kvm->slots_lock);
r = __kvm_set_memory_region(kvm, mem);
mutex_unlock(&kvm->slots_lock);
return r;
}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_set_memory_region);
static int kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region(struct kvm *kvm,
struct kvm_userspace_memory_region *mem)
{
- if ((u16)mem->slot >= KVM_USER_MEM_SLOTS)
- return -EINVAL;
-
return kvm_set_memory_region(kvm, mem);
}
The idea here was that kvm_set_memory_region could be used to set
private memory slots while not taking kvm->slots_lock.
So, I would instead:
1) rename __kvm_set_memory_region to kvm_set_memory_region;
2) inline the old kvm_set_memory_region into kvm_vm_ioctl_set_memory_region.
3) replace the comment "Must be called holding kvm->slots_lock for
write." with a proper lockdep_assert_held() now that the function
doesn't have the __ warning sign in front of it.
Paolo