Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] Fix x86 emulator's fault propagations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Gleb Natapov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 10:45:41AM +0900, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
My motivation: What I want to achive by this
work is to make the basic style of x86 emulator
better for the following developments. Actually
unless we handle the fault properly, our works
implementing each instruction's emulation may
end up with no effect.
Why do you want to emulate every instruction?

--
			Gleb.

No, I do not think we have to emulate every instruction.
I might write something misleading.

But I want to know which instructions or modes are not implemented
yet but have to be implemented in the future, if they may effect
to end users. We may get some questions like "Are there any
instructions which are not supported by KVM?" in the future:
because (advanced)customers will find "FIXME" in the source code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux