Re: [PATCH v9 02/10] s390x/cpu topology: core_id sets s390x CPU topology

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 9/27/22 14:03, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 9/2/22 09:55, Pierre Morel wrote:
In the S390x CPU topology the core_id specifies the CPU address
and the position of the core withing the topology.

Let's build the topology based on the core_id.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
  hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c         | 135 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
  hw/s390x/meson.build            |   1 +
  hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c      |  10 +++
  include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h |  42 ++++++++++
  4 files changed, 188 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
  create mode 100644 include/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h

diff --git a/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..a6ca006ec5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/hw/s390x/cpu-topology.c
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * CPU Topology
+ *
+ * Copyright IBM Corp. 2022
+ * Author(s): Pierre Morel <pmorel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
+
+ * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or (at
+ * your option) any later version. See the COPYING file in the top-level
+ * directory.
+ */
+
+#include "qemu/osdep.h"
+#include "qapi/error.h"
+#include "qemu/error-report.h"
+#include "hw/sysbus.h"
+#include "hw/qdev-properties.h"
+#include "hw/boards.h"
+#include "qemu/typedefs.h"
+#include "target/s390x/cpu.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
+
+S390Topology *s390_get_topology(void)
+{
+    static S390Topology *s390Topology;
+
+    if (!s390Topology) {
+        s390Topology = S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY(
+            object_resolve_path(TYPE_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY, NULL));
+    }
+
+    return s390Topology;
+}
+
+/*
+ * s390_topology_new_cpu:
+ * @core_id: the core ID is machine wide
+ *
+ * The topology returned by s390_get_topology(), gives us the CPU
+ * topology established by the -smp QEMU aruments.
+ * The core-id gives:
+ *  - the Container TLE (Topology List Entry) containing the CPU TLE.
+ *  - in the CPU TLE the origin, or offset of the first bit in the core mask
+ *  - the bit in the CPU TLE core mask
+ */
+void s390_topology_new_cpu(int core_id)
+{
+    S390Topology *topo = s390_get_topology();
+    int socket_id;
+    int bit, origin;
+
+    /* In the case no Topology is used nothing is to be done here */
+    if (!topo) {
+        return;
+    }
+
+    socket_id = core_id / topo->cores;
+
+    bit = core_id;
+    origin = bit / 64;
+    bit %= 64;
+    bit = 63 - bit;
+
+    /*
+     * At the core level, each CPU is represented by a bit in a 64bit
+     * unsigned long. Set on plug and clear on unplug of a CPU.

Do we have CPU unplug on s390x ?

not in QEMU.

I will change this sentence.


+     * The firmware assume that all CPU in a CPU TLE have the same
+     * type, polarization and are all dedicated or shared.
+     * In the case a socket contains CPU with different type, polarization +     * or entitlement then they will be defined in different CPU containers. +     * Currently we assume all CPU are identical IFL CPUs and that they are
+     * all dedicated CPUs.
+     * The only reason to have several S390TopologyCores inside a socket is
+     * to have more than 64 CPUs.
+     * In that case the origin field, representing the offset of the first CPU +     * in the CPU container allows to represent up to the maximal number of
+     * CPU inside several CPU containers inside the socket container.
+     */
+    topo->socket[socket_id].active_count++;
+    topo->tle[socket_id].active_count++;
+    set_bit(bit, &topo->tle[socket_id].mask[origin]);
+}
+
+/**
+ * s390_topology_realize:
+ * @dev: the device state
+ * @errp: the error pointer (not used)
+ *
+ * During realize the machine CPU topology is initialized with the
+ * QEMU -smp parameters.
+ * The maximum count of CPU TLE in the all Topology can not be greater
+ * than the maximum CPUs.
+ */
+static void s390_topology_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp)
+{
+    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine());

Using qdev_get_machine() is suspicious :)

OK


+    S390Topology *topo = S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY(dev);
+    int n;
+
+    topo->sockets = ms->smp.sockets;
+    topo->cores = ms->smp.cores;
+    topo->tles = ms->smp.max_cpus;

These look like object properties to me.

It is a temporary store to keep them at hand.
I will see if I keep them afterall.
If I keep them I will make them property.


+
+    n = topo->sockets;
+    topo->socket = g_malloc0(n * sizeof(S390TopoContainer));
+    topo->tle = g_malloc0(topo->tles * sizeof(S390TopoTLE));
+}
+
+/**
+ * topology_class_init:
+ * @oc: Object class
+ * @data: (not used)
+ *
+ * A very simple object we will need for reset and migration.
+ */
+static void topology_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data)
+{
+    DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc);
+
+    dc->realize = s390_topology_realize;
+    set_bit(DEVICE_CATEGORY_MISC, dc->categories);
+}

no vmstate ?

it is added in a later patch


+static const TypeInfo cpu_topology_info = {
+    .name          = TYPE_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY,
+    .parent        = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
+    .instance_size = sizeof(S390Topology),
+    .class_init    = topology_class_init,
+};
+
+static void topology_register(void)
+{
+    type_register_static(&cpu_topology_info);
+}
+type_init(topology_register);
diff --git a/hw/s390x/meson.build b/hw/s390x/meson.build
index de28a90a57..96d7d7d231 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/meson.build
+++ b/hw/s390x/meson.build
@@ -2,6 +2,7 @@ s390x_ss = ss.source_set()
  s390x_ss.add(files(
    'ap-bridge.c',
    'ap-device.c',
+  'cpu-topology.c',
    'ccw-device.c',
    'css-bridge.c',
    'css.c',
diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
index b5ca154e2f..15cefd104b 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c
@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
  #include "sysemu/sysemu.h"
  #include "hw/s390x/pv.h"
  #include "migration/blocker.h"
+#include "hw/s390x/cpu-topology.h"
  static Error *pv_mig_blocker;
@@ -247,6 +248,12 @@ static void ccw_init(MachineState *machine)
      /* init memory + setup max page size. Required for the CPU model */
      s390_memory_init(machine->ram);
+    /* Adding the topology must be done before CPU intialization*/
+    dev = qdev_new(TYPE_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY);
+    object_property_add_child(qdev_get_machine(), TYPE_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY,

No need to use qdev_get_machine(), you have 'machine' above.

OK


+                              OBJECT(dev));
+    sysbus_realize_and_unref(SYS_BUS_DEVICE(dev), &error_fatal);


why not store a TYPE_S390_CPU_TOPOLOGY object pointer under the machine
state for later use ?

May be, I will think about it.


+
      /* init CPUs (incl. CPU model) early so s390_has_feature() works */
      s390_init_cpus(machine);
@@ -309,6 +316,9 @@ static void s390_cpu_plug(HotplugHandler *hotplug_dev,
      g_assert(!ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu);
      ms->possible_cpus->cpus[cpu->env.core_id].cpu = OBJECT(dev);
+    /* Inserting the CPU in the Topology can not fail */
+    s390_topology_new_cpu(cpu->env.core_id);
+

in which case, we could use the topo object pointer to insert a new CPU
id and drop s390_get_topology() which looks overkill.

I would add the test :

    if (!S390_CCW_MACHINE(machine)->topology_disable) {

before inserting to be consistent. But I am anticipating some other
patch.

It belongs here for bisect so I will add it here.
Thanks.


C.



Thanks,
Pierre

--
Pierre Morel
IBM Lab Boeblingen



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux