On Thu, Sep 22, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote: > Regarding the "defer" patches, your patches are ok (with one or two tweaks), but > there are existing bugs that I believe will interact poorly with using reprogram_pmi > more agressively. Nothing major, but I'd prefer to get everything squared away > before merging, and definitely want your input on my proposed fixes. I'll post > the patches shortly. I take that back, there are issues with deferred overflow handling. I'll follow-up in the patch.