On Tue, Sep 13, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> > >> +/* > >> + * With HV_ACCESS_TSC_INVARIANT feature, invariant TSC (CPUID.80000007H:EDX[8]) > >> + * is only observed after HV_X64_MSR_TSC_INVARIANT_CONTROL was written to. > >> + */ > >> +static inline bool kvm_hv_invtsc_filtered(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) > > > > Can this be more strongly worded, e.g. maybe kvm_hv_is_invtsc_disabled()? "Filtered" > > doesn't strictly mean disabled and makes it sound like there's something else that > > needs to act on the "filtering" > > > > "Hidden"? :-) I'm OK with kvm_hv_is_invtsc_disabled() too. Hidden works for me. Or suppressed, inihbited, whatever. Just not filtered :-)
