On Thu, Sep 8, 2022 at 4:04 AM Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The SBI v1.0 specificaiton is functionally same as SBI v0.3 > specification except that SBI v1.0 specification went through > the full RISC-V International ratification process. > > Let us change the SBI specification version to v1.0. > > Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <apatel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > index 26a446a34057..d4e3e600beef 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/kvm_vcpu_sbi.h > @@ -11,8 +11,8 @@ > > #define KVM_SBI_IMPID 3 > > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 0 > -#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MINOR 3 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MAJOR 1 > +#define KVM_SBI_VERSION_MINOR 0 > > struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension { > unsigned long extid_start; > -- > 2.34.1 > Reviewed-by: Atish Patra <atishp@xxxxxxxxxxxx> -- Regards, Atish