> > @@ -10700,6 +10706,12 @@ static int vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > if (kvm_cpu_has_pending_timer(vcpu))
> > kvm_inject_pending_timer_irqs(vcpu);
> >
> > + if (vcpu->arch.nested_get_pages_pending) {
> > + r = kvm_get_nested_state_pages(vcpu);
> > + if (r <= 0)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
>
> Will this leads to skip the get_nested_state_pages for L2 first time
> vmentry in every L2 running iteration ? Because with above changes
> KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES is not set in
> nested_vmx_enter_non_root_mode() and
> vcpu->arch.nested_get_pages_pending is not checked in
> vcpu_enter_guest().
>
Good catch. I think the diff won't work when vcpu is runnable. It only
tries to catch the vcpu block case. Even for the vcpu block case, the
check of KVM_REQ_UNBLOCK is way too late. Ah, kvm_vcpu_check_block()
is called by kvm_vcpu_block() which is called by vcpu_block(). The
warning is triggered at the very beginning of vcpu_block(), i.e.,
within kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(). So, please ignore the trace in my
previous email.
In addition, my minor push back for that is
vcpu->arch.nested_get_pages_pending seems to be another
KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES.
Thanks.
-Mingwei
-Mingwei
