Re: [PATCH 00/18] KVM: PPC: Virtualize Gekko guests

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 02/09/2010 01:13 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/09/2010 01:00 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
That's pretty impressive (never saw x86 with this exit rate) but it's
more than 1000 times slower than the hardware, assuming 1 fpu IPC (and
the processor can probably do more).  An fpu intensive application
will slow to a crawl.

Measuring a typical Gekko application, I get about 200k-250k of fpu
(incl. paired singles) instructions per second.

Virtualized, yes?  What's the rate on bare metal?

Emulated. I can't measure anything on bare metal.

Well, then, the rate may be low due to virtualization overhead. Any way to compare absolute performance?

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux