----- Original Message -----
> From: "jasowang" <jasowang@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "Guo Zhi" <qtxuning1999@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "eperezma" <eperezma@xxxxxxxxxx>, "sgarzare" <sgarzare@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Michael
> Tsirkin" <mst@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "netdev" <netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "kvm list" <kvm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
> "virtualization" <virtualization@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2022 3:01:31 PM
> Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/7] vhost: expose used buffers
> 在 2022/8/17 21:57, Guo Zhi 写道:
>> Follow VIRTIO 1.1 spec, only writing out a single used ring for a batch
>> of descriptors.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Guo Zhi <qtxuning1999@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
>> drivers/vhost/vhost.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> index 40097826cff0..7b20fa5a46c3 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c
>> @@ -2376,10 +2376,20 @@ static int __vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue
>> *vq,
>> vring_used_elem_t __user *used;
>> u16 old, new;
>> int start;
>> + int copy_n = count;
>>
>> + /**
>> + * If in order feature negotiated, devices can notify the use of a batch of
>> buffers to
>> + * the driver by only writing out a single used ring entry with the id
>> corresponding
>> + * to the head entry of the descriptor chain describing the last buffer in the
>> batch.
>> + */
>> + if (vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {
>> + copy_n = 1;
>> + heads = &heads[count - 1];
>
>
> Do we need to check whether or not the buffer is fully used before doing
> this?
>
This is the caller / user of __vhost_add_used_n's duty to make sure all buffer is fully used.
The device will only batch if all heads are fully used.
>
>> + }
>> start = vq->last_used_idx & (vq->num - 1);
>> used = vq->used->ring + start;
>> - if (vhost_put_used(vq, heads, start, count)) {
>> + if (vhost_put_used(vq, heads, start, copy_n)) {
>> vq_err(vq, "Failed to write used");
>> return -EFAULT;
>> }
>> @@ -2410,7 +2420,7 @@ int vhost_add_used_n(struct vhost_virtqueue *vq, struct
>> vring_used_elem *heads,
>>
>> start = vq->last_used_idx & (vq->num - 1);
>> n = vq->num - start;
>> - if (n < count) {
>> + if (n < count && !vhost_has_feature(vq, VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER)) {
>> r = __vhost_add_used_n(vq, heads, n);
>> if (r < 0)
>> return r;
>> diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>> index d9109107af08..0d5c49a30421 100644
>> --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>> +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.h
>> @@ -236,6 +236,7 @@ enum {
>> VHOST_FEATURES = (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_NOTIFY_ON_EMPTY) |
>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC) |
>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_RING_F_EVENT_IDX) |
>> + (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_IN_ORDER) |
>> (1ULL << VHOST_F_LOG_ALL) |
>
>
> Are we sure all vhost devices can support in-order (especially the SCSI)?
>
> It looks better to start from a device specific one.
>
> Thanks
>
Sorry for my mistake, I will change it.
>
>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT) |
>> (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)
