Re: [PATCH v7 00/14] KVM: mm: fd-based approach for supporting KVM guest private memory

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Aug 21, 2022 at 11:27:44AM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 08:00:41PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > tmpfs and hugetlbfs and page cache are designed around sharing memory:
> > TDX is designed around absolutely not sharing memory; and the further
> > uses which Sean foresees appear not to need it as page cache either.
> > 
> > Except perhaps for page migration reasons.  It's somewhat incidental,  
> > but of course page migration knows how to migrate page cache, so
> > masquerading as page cache will give a short cut to page migration,
> > when page migration becomes at all possible.
> 
> I haven't read the patch series, and I'm not taking a position one way
> or the other on whether this is better implemented as a shmem addition
> or a shim that asks shmem for memory.  Page migration can be done for
> driver memory by using PageMovable.  I just rewrote how it works, so
> the details are top of my mind at the moment if anyone wants something
> explained.  Commit 68f2736a8583 is the key one to look at.

Thanks Matthew. That is helpful to understand the current code.

Chao



[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux