On 02/07/2010 04:26 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
Well, to me it makes more sense to name them from the point of view of
the vcpu that is doing the update.
I'm open for a better name - except for "sync" as writebacks are always
synchronous from the POV of the modified VCPU.
I meant that the state itself is synchronous from the POV of the vcpu.
That is, rax can only be changed by the core, but INIT state may be
changed by the other cores.
Is KVM_PUT_RUNTIME_STATE
clearer?
They're all runtime. I guess this issue will always be confusing, so
best to slap a comment on top of the define to explain it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
