On Fri, 19 Aug 2022 01:55:57 +0100,
Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The ring-based dirty memory tracking has been available and enabled
> on x86 for a while. The feature is beneficial when the number of
> dirty pages is small in a checkpointing system or live migration
> scenario. More details can be found from fb04a1eddb1a ("KVM: X86:
> Implement ring-based dirty memory tracking").
>
> This enables the ring-based dirty memory tracking on ARM64. It's
> notable that no extra reserved ring entries are needed on ARM64
> because the huge pages are always split into base pages when page
> dirty tracking is enabled.
Can you please elaborate on this? Adding a per-CPU ring of course
results in extra memory allocation, so there must be a subtle
x86-specific detail that I'm not aware of...
>
> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> index abd7c32126ce..19fa1ac017ed 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/api.rst
> @@ -8022,7 +8022,7 @@ regardless of what has actually been exposed through the CPUID leaf.
> 8.29 KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING
> ---------------------------
>
> -:Architectures: x86
> +:Architectures: x86, arm64
> :Parameters: args[0] - size of the dirty log ring
>
> KVM is capable of tracking dirty memory using ring buffers that are
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 3bb134355874..7e04b0b8d2b2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@
> #define __KVM_HAVE_VCPU_EVENTS
>
> #define KVM_COALESCED_MMIO_PAGE_OFFSET 1
> +#define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET 64
For context, the documentation says:
<quote>
- if KVM_CAP_DIRTY_LOG_RING is available, a number of pages at
KVM_DIRTY_LOG_PAGE_OFFSET * PAGE_SIZE. [...]
</quote>
What is the reason for picking this particular value?
>
> #define KVM_REG_SIZE(id) \
> (1U << (((id) & KVM_REG_SIZE_MASK) >> KVM_REG_SIZE_SHIFT))
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> index 815cc118c675..0309b2d0f2da 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/Kconfig
> @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ menuconfig KVM
> select KVM_VFIO
> select HAVE_KVM_EVENTFD
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQFD
> + select HAVE_KVM_DIRTY_RING
> select HAVE_KVM_MSI
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQCHIP
> select HAVE_KVM_IRQ_ROUTING
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 986cee6fbc7f..3de6b9b39db7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -866,6 +866,14 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> if (!ret)
> ret = 1;
>
> + /* Force vcpu exit if its dirty ring is soft-full */
> + if (unlikely(vcpu->kvm->dirty_ring_size &&
> + kvm_dirty_ring_soft_full(&vcpu->dirty_ring))) {
> + vcpu->run->exit_reason = KVM_EXIT_DIRTY_RING_FULL;
> + trace_kvm_dirty_ring_exit(vcpu);
> + ret = 0;
> + }
> +
Why can't this be moved to kvm_vcpu_exit_request() instead? I would
also very much like the check to be made a common helper with x86.
A seemingly approach would be to make this a request on dirty log
insertion, and avoid the whole "check the log size" on every run,
which adds pointless overhead to unsuspecting users (aka everyone).
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
