[kvm-unit-tests PATCH v2 0/5] Test for illegal LEA & related fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Is this a correct way to put Sean's and Paolo's patches into this
series? I wasn't sure which patches are accepted or what is the current
base-commit, but I haven't seen the tip of kvm-unit-tests repo moving,
so here is it.

Michal Luczaj (3):
  x86: emulator.c cleanup: Save and restore exception handlers
  x86: emulator.c cleanup: Use ASM_TRY() for the UD_VECTOR cases
  x86: Test emulator's handling of LEA with /reg

Paolo Bonzini (1):
  x86: Introduce ASM_TRY_FEP() to handle exceptions thrown by
    FEP-triggered emulator

Sean Christopherson (1):
  x86: Dedup 32-bit vs. 64-bit ASM_TRY() by stealing kernel's
    __ASM_SEL()

 lib/x86/desc.h      |  22 +++----
 lib/x86/processor.h |  12 ++++
 x86/emulator.c      | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)

-- 
2.37.1




[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]

  Powered by Linux