On Fri, Jul 29, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 7/29/22 00:13, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > The only flaw in this is if KVM gets handed a CPUID model that enumerates support > > for 2025 (or whenever the next update comes) but not 2022. Hmm, though if Microsoft > > defines each new "version" as a full superset, then even that theoretical bug goes > > away. I'm happy to be optimistic for once and give this a shot. I definitely like > > that it makes it easier to see the deltas between versions. > > Okay, I have queued the series but I still haven't gone through all the > comments. So this will _not_ be in the 5.21 pull request. I assume you meant 5.20? > The first patch also needs a bit more thought to figure out the impact on > userspace and whether we can consider syndbg niche enough to not care. > > Paolo >
