On 7/26/22 11:01 AM, Eric Farman wrote:
Now that neither vfio_ccw_sch_probe() nor vfio_ccw_mdev_probe()
affect the FSM state, it doesn't make sense for their _remove()
counterparts try to revert things in this way. Since the FSM open
and close are handled alongside MDEV open/close, these are
unnecessary.
Signed-off-by: Eric Farman <farman@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c | 1 -
drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c | 2 --
2 files changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
index 4804101ccb0f..86d9e428357b 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_drv.c
@@ -241,7 +241,6 @@ static void vfio_ccw_sch_remove(struct subchannel *sch)
{
struct vfio_ccw_private *private = dev_get_drvdata(&sch->dev);
- vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_CLOSE);
mdev_unregister_device(&sch->dev);
dev_set_drvdata(&sch->dev, NULL);
diff --git a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
index 3f67fa103c7f..4a806a2273b5 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/cio/vfio_ccw_ops.c
@@ -130,8 +130,6 @@ static void vfio_ccw_mdev_remove(struct mdev_device *mdev)
vfio_unregister_group_dev(&private->vdev);
- vfio_ccw_fsm_event(private, VFIO_CCW_EVENT_CLOSE);
-
vfio_uninit_group_dev(&private->vdev);
atomic_inc(&private->avail);
}
