On Thu, 14 Jul 2022 18:09:12 +1000
Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Grepping for "iommu_ops" finds this spot and gives wrong impression
> that iommu_ops is used in here, fix the comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> index 708a95e61831..cd7b9c136889 100644
> --- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> +++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_spapr_tce.c
> @@ -1266,7 +1266,7 @@ static int tce_iommu_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
> goto unlock_exit;
> }
>
> - /* Check if new group has the same iommu_ops (i.e. compatible) */
> + /* Check if new group has the same iommu_table_group_ops (i.e. compatible) */
> list_for_each_entry(tcegrp, &container->group_list, next) {
> struct iommu_table_group *table_group_tmp;
>
Applied to vfio next branch for v5.20 with a conversion to a multi-line
comment to avoid the long line. Thanks,
Alex
