On Mon, 18 Jul 2022 19:40:05 +0100, Vincent Donnefort <vdonnefort@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [...] > > In the end, we don't seem to use much from the struct kvm_cpu. Is it for > convinience that a smaller struct kvm_shadow_cpu hasn't been created, or we do > anticipate a later wider usage? The alternative would be to repaint the whole of the core KVM/arm64 code to be able to take the new structure in parallel with the standard one. There is very little to gain from such a move. M. -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
