On 7/13/2022 4:35 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 10:14:43AM +0800,
Yuan Yao <yuan.yao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
+int tdx_vcpu_ioctl(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, void __user *argp)
+{
+ struct kvm_tdx *kvm_tdx = to_kvm_tdx(vcpu->kvm);
+ struct vcpu_tdx *tdx = to_tdx(vcpu);
+ struct kvm_tdx_cmd cmd;
+ u64 err;
+
+ if (tdx->initialized)
Minor: How about "tdx_vcpu->initialized" ? there's
"is_td_initialized()" below, the "tdx" here may lead guys to treat it
as whole td vm until they confirmed it's type again.
I think you man tdx->vcpu_initialized. If so, makes sense. I'll rename it.
IMO, no need to do so.
All around tdx.c, "tdx" is the brief pointer name, just like "vmx" used
in vmx.c. People will get used to it.
