Re: Unable to single-step in kvm, always results in a resume

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Jan Kiszka wrote:
Nicholas Amon wrote:
So now I can step instruction but my breakpoints do not work. I have verified that disabling kvm restores the breakpoint functionality. Any suggestions?

What kind of breakpoints, hardware-assisted or normal BPs? Are you
trying to break into real-mode code (as stated below - BTW, top-postings
should be avoided!) that happens to run on a non-brand-new Intel host? I
never fully tested how well guest debugging works if KVM has to emulate
instructions, and I wouldn't be surprised if there are "limitations".

Jan

Jan Kiszka wrote:
Hi Nicholas,

please don't drop CCs on reply.

Nicholas Amon wrote:
Hi Jan,

Thanks for responding. Yes, I am able to step instruction when I disable kvm w/ the no-kvm option. My host kernel is 64bit 2.6.27 and the program that I am debugging is 32 bit but starts in real mode. But the KVM module I am running is from kvm-88. Is there anyway I can check the version definitively?
kvm modules issue a message when being loaded, check your kernel log.
qemu-kvm gives you the version via -version.

OK, the problems you see is likely related to the very old versions you
use. Update to recent kvm-kmod (2.6.32 series) and qemu-kvm (0.12
series) and retry.

Jan

Thanks,

Nicholas

Jan Kiszka wrote:
Jan Kiszka wrote:
Nicholas Amon wrote:
Hi All,

I am trying to single-step through my kernel using qemu and kvm.  I have
run qemu via:  qemu-system-x86_64 -s -S -hda
/home/nickamon/lab1/obj/kernel.img and also connected to the process
using gdb.

Problem is that whenever I try and step instruction, it seems to resume
my kernel rather than allowing me to progress instruction by
instruction. I have built the kvm snapshot from git and still no luck. Tried following the code for a few hours and have no luck. Any
suggestions?
What's you host kernel or kvm-kmod version?

...and does -no-kvm make any difference (except that it's much slower)?

Jan


My apologies for the late response. Normal breakpoints and yes I am breaking in real mode. This isn't a big issue for me since I am able to break when I disable kvm. So basically I disable kvm when I want to debug and enable it during normal execution. Thanks for all your help.

Nick

Nicholas Amon
See How to Control & Track High-Risk Users: Join our Webinar on Tuesday, June 2
Network World Names Xceedium GateKeeper "RSA 2009 Best of Show"

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux