Re: [Autotest] [Autotest PATCH] KVM-test: Add a subtest image_copy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 11:43 +0800, Yolkfull Chow wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:04:09PM -0200, Lucas Meneghel Rodrigues wrote:
> > Yolkfull, I am copying Michael and Lawrence on the e-mail so they can
> > comment on the points I am going to present.
> 
> Lucas, firstly thank you very much for addressing your viewpoints and the
> coding/logical suggestions. Most of them are reasonable and appreciated
> except that I also have an improvidence about point 3):
> 
> Your idea on executing image_copy as a backup of unattended_install is good.
> But I think we could also seperate 'unattended_install' from test set of
> "functional testing" and encapsulate it into "Installation testing" set.
> In this way the following functional test cases will not be affected by
> failed installation tests.
> 
> What do you think about this?

I believe this could be implemented by simply removing the dependency.
However, if *no* install test succeed whatsoever, then we don't have any
way to perform the subsequent tests. So I don't know how to implement
this idea.

Please explain me how that encapsulation would work.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux