Re: [PATCH qemu-kvm] Add raw(af_packet) network backend to qemu

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 02:50:28PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/26/2010 02:47 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> On 01/26/2010 02:40 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
>>> This patch adds raw socket backend to qemu and is based on Or Gerlitz's
>>> patch re-factored and ported to the latest qemu-kvm git tree.
>>> It also includes support for vnet_hdr option that enables gso/checksum
>>> offload with raw backend. You can find the linux kernel patch to support
>>> this feature here.
>>>     http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/150308
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sridhar Samudrala<sri@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> See the previous discussion about the raw backend from Or's original  
>> patch.  There's no obvious reason why we should have this in addition  
>> to a tun/tap backend.

I thought this was cleared already: vepa support is the requirement
here.  Existing tap solution requires management of host linux
networking which some users would rather avoid.

>> The only use-case I know of is macvlan but macvtap addresses this  
>> functionality while not introduce the rather nasty security problems  
>> associated with a raw backend.

I am not sure I agree with this sentiment.  The main issue being that
macvtap doesn't exist on all kernels :). macvlan also requires hardware
support, packet socket can work with any network card in promisc mode.

> Not to mention that from a user perspective, raw makes almost no sense  
> as it's an obscure socket protocol family.
>
> A user wants to do useful things like bridged networking or direct VF  
> assignment.  We should have -net backends that reflect things that make  
> sense to a user.
>
> Regards,
>
> Anthony Liguori


I agree to that. People don't even seem to agree whether it's a raw
socket or a packet socket :) We need a better name for this option: what
it really does is rely on an external device to loopback a packet to us,
so how about -net loopback or -net extbridge?

-- 
MST
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [KVM ARM]     [KVM ia64]     [KVM ppc]     [Virtualization Tools]     [Spice Development]     [Libvirt]     [Libvirt Users]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Questions]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]
  Powered by Linux