Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On Mon, 2022-06-27 at 18:04 +0200, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Changes since RFC:
>> - "KVM: VMX: Extend VMX controls macro shenanigans" PATCH added and the
>> infrastructure is later used in other patches [Sean] PATCHes 1-3 added
>> to support the change.
>> - "KVM: VMX: Clear controls obsoleted by EPT at runtime, not setup" PATCH
>> added [Sean].
>> - Commit messages added.
>>
>> vmcs_config is a sanitized version of host VMX MSRs where some controls are
>> filtered out (e.g. when Enlightened VMCS is enabled, some know bugs are
>> discovered, some inconsistencies in controls are detected,...) but
>> nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs() uses raw host MSRs instead. This may end up
>> in exposing undesired controls to L1. Switch to using vmcs_config instead.
>>
>> Sean Christopherson (1):
>> KVM: VMX: Clear controls obsoleted by EPT at runtime, not setup
>>
>> Vitaly Kuznetsov (13):
>> KVM: VMX: Check VM_ENTRY_IA32E_MODE in setup_vmcs_config()
>> KVM: VMX: Check CPU_BASED_{INTR,NMI}_WINDOW_EXITING in
>> setup_vmcs_config()
>> KVM: VMX: Tweak the special handling of SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING
>> in setup_vmcs_config()
>> KVM: VMX: Extend VMX controls macro shenanigans
>> KVM: VMX: Move CPU_BASED_CR8_{LOAD,STORE}_EXITING filtering out of
>> setup_vmcs_config()
>> KVM: VMX: Add missing VMEXIT controls to vmcs_config
>> KVM: VMX: Add missing VMENTRY controls to vmcs_config
>> KVM: VMX: Add missing CPU based VM execution controls to vmcs_config
>> KVM: nVMX: Use sanitized allowed-1 bits for VMX control MSRs
>> KVM: VMX: Store required-1 VMX controls in vmcs_config
>> KVM: nVMX: Use sanitized required-1 bits for VMX control MSRs
>> KVM: VMX: Cache MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC in vmcs_config
>> KVM: nVMX: Use cached host MSR_IA32_VMX_MISC value for setting up
>> nested MSR
>>
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/capabilities.h | 16 +--
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 37 +++---
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.h | 2 +-
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 198 ++++++++++++++------------------
>> arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 118 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 229 insertions(+), 142 deletions(-)
>>
> Sorry that I was a bit out of loop on this, so before I review it,
> does this patch series solve the eVMCS issue we had alone,
> or we still need the eVMCS version patch series as well?
"[PATCH 00/11] KVM: VMX: Support TscScaling and EnclsExitingBitmap whith
eVMCS" adds new features, namely TSC scaling for both KVM-on-Hyper-V and
Hyper-V-on-KVM. This series doesn't add any features but avoids the
problem reported by Anirudh by properly filtering values in L1 VMX MSRs.
TL;DR: Both series are needed.
--
Vitaly
