On 6/22/22 04:16, Kai Huang wrote: > @@ -1319,6 +1330,10 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, mhp_t mhp_flags) > if (ret) > return ret; > > + ret = arch_memory_add_precheck(nid, start, size, mhp_flags); > + if (ret) > + return ret; Shouldn't a patch that claims to be only for "driver managed memory" be patching add_memory_driver_managed()?
