Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 6/21/22 15:17, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: >>> >>> Just to be clear, PV IPI does*not* support the VP_ID, right? >> Hm, with Hyper-V PV IPI hypercall vCPUs are also addressed by their >> VP_IDs, not by their APIC ids so similar to Hyper-V PV TLB flush we need >> to convert the supplied set (either flat u64 bitmask of VP_IDs for >> non-EX hypercall or a sparse set for -EX). >> > > So this means the series needs a v8, right? > No, I was just trying to explaini what the patch is doing in the series, it looks good to me (but I'm biased, of course). -- Vitaly
