On Wed, 2022-06-22 at 10:57 +0100, Paul Durrant wrote:
> +void kvm_xen_set_cpuid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> + u32 base = 0;
> + u32 function;
> +
> + vcpu->arch.xen.tsc_info_1 = NULL;
> + vcpu->arch.xen.tsc_info_2 = NULL;
> +
> + for_each_possible_hypervisor_cpuid_base(function) {
> + struct kvm_cpuid_entry2 *entry = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, 0);
> +
> + if (entry &&
> + entry->ebx == XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EBX &&
> + entry->ecx == XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_ECX &&
> + entry->edx == XEN_CPUID_SIGNATURE_EDX) {
> + base = function;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
Please make it return if entry->eax < 3 here. There probably aren't any
*good* reasons why a leaf at 0x40000x03 would exist and belong to some
other entity (Hyper-V, etc.). Those other extra ranges of CPUID are
generally aligned at multiples of 0x100, not just the *next* available
leaf.
But I don't care. Unless eax on the main Xen leaf is 3 or more, the
leaf at N+3 isn't yours to reason about :)
> + if (!base)
> + return;
> +
> + function = base | XEN_CPUID_LEAF(3);
> + vcpu->arch.xen.tsc_info_1 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, 1);
> + vcpu->arch.xen.tsc_info_2 = kvm_find_cpuid_entry(vcpu, function, 2);
> +}
> +
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
