On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:01 PM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Add an apostrophe in a comment about it being the caller's, not callers,
> responsibility to free an object.
>
> Reported-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 768e9a61856b ("KVM: selftests: Purge vm+vcpu_id == vcpu silliness")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> index 39f2f5f1338f..0c550fb0dab2 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/kvm_util.c
> @@ -1434,7 +1434,7 @@ void vcpu_run_complete_io(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> /*
> * Get the list of guest registers which are supported for
> * KVM_GET_ONE_REG/KVM_SET_ONE_REG ioctls. Returns a kvm_reg_list pointer,
> - * it is the callers responsibility to free the list.
> + * it is the caller's responsibility to free the list.
> */
Shouldn't that be callers'? Or are you assuming there is only ever
going to be one caller?
