On 01/23/2010 08:56 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 03:31:47PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
Assume that if the guest executes clts, it knows what it's doing, and load the
guest fpu to prevent an #NM exception.
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity<avi@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
Out of curiosity, previously you assumed lazy activation on clts was a
win. Why undo it?
It wasn't so much assuming it's a win, it's more I was too lazy to find
out. But it was easy to see from the traces that clts is often followed
by #NM.
--
Do not meddle in the internals of kernels, for they are subtle and quick to panic.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
