On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 6:04 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2022, Anup Patel wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 9:26 PM Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 7, 2022 at 8:57 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Marc, Christian, Anup, can you please give this a go? > > > > > > > > Sure, I will try this series. > > > > > > I tried to apply this series on top of kvm/next and kvm/queue but > > > I always get conflicts. It seems this series is dependent on other > > > in-flight patches. > > > > Hrm, that's odd, it's based directly on kvm/queue, commit 55371f1d0c01 ("KVM: ...). > > Duh, Paolo updated kvm/queue. Where's Captain Obvious when you need him... > > > > Is there a branch somewhere in a public repo ? > > > > https://github.com/sean-jc/linux/tree/x86/selftests_overhaul > > I pushed a new version that's based on the current kvm/queue, commit 5e9402ac128b. > arm and x86 look good (though I've yet to test on AMD). > I have tested this for KVM RISC-V and it works fine. Tested-by: Anup Patel <anup@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Regards, Anup