On Wed, Jun 08, 2022, Andrew Jones wrote: > On Fri, Jun 03, 2022 at 12:41:48AM +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > Use vm_create_without_vcpus() instead of open coding a rough equivalent > > in hardware_disable_test. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c > > index 81ba8645772a..32837207fe4e 100644 > > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c > > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/hardware_disable_test.c > > @@ -104,9 +104,7 @@ static void run_test(uint32_t run) > > for (i = 0; i < VCPU_NUM; i++) > > CPU_SET(i, &cpu_set); > > > > - vm = vm_create(DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES); > > - kvm_vm_elf_load(vm, program_invocation_name); > > - vm_create_irqchip(vm); > > + vm = vm_create_without_vcpus(VM_MODE_DEFAULT, DEFAULT_GUEST_PHY_PAGES); > nit: ^ extra space Heh, and I managed to carry that to the end of the series. At least I'm consistent?
