On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 02:34:17PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The caller always call it with root_level = vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.level.
It'd be helpful to be more specific about the caller. e.g.
Use root_level in svm_load_mmu_pg() rather that looking up the root
level in vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.level. svm_load_mmu_pgd() has only
one caller, kvm_mmu_load_pgd(), which always passes
vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.level as root_level.
No functional change intended.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> index 3b49337998ec..f45d11739314 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
> @@ -3951,7 +3951,7 @@ static void svm_load_mmu_pgd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, hpa_t root_hpa,
> hv_track_root_tdp(vcpu, root_hpa);
>
> cr3 = vcpu->arch.cr3;
> - } else if (vcpu->arch.mmu->root_role.level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> + } else if (root_level >= PT64_ROOT_4LEVEL) {
> cr3 = __sme_set(root_hpa) | kvm_get_active_pcid(vcpu);
> } else {
> /* PCID in the guest should be impossible with a 32-bit MMU. */
> --
> 2.19.1.6.gb485710b
>
