Now that __emulator_pio_in already fills "val" for in-kernel PIO, it
is both simpler and clearer not to use emulator_pio_in.
Use the appropriate function in kvm_fast_pio_in and complete_fast_pio_in,
respectively __emulator_pio_in and complete_emulator_pio_in.
emulator_pio_in_emulated is now the last caller of emulator_pio_in.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 8 ++------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 3b641cd2ff6f..aefcc71a7040 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -8692,11 +8692,7 @@ static int complete_fast_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
/* For size less than 4 we merge, else we zero extend */
val = (vcpu->arch.pio.size < 4) ? kvm_rax_read(vcpu) : 0;
- /*
- * Since vcpu->arch.pio.count == 1 let emulator_pio_in perform
- * the copy and tracing
- */
- emulator_pio_in(vcpu, vcpu->arch.pio.size, vcpu->arch.pio.port, &val, 1);
+ complete_emulator_pio_in(vcpu, &val);
kvm_rax_write(vcpu, val);
return kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(vcpu);
@@ -8711,7 +8707,7 @@ static int kvm_fast_pio_in(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, int size,
/* For size less than 4 we merge, else we zero extend */
val = (size < 4) ? kvm_rax_read(vcpu) : 0;
- ret = emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, &val, 1);
+ ret = __emulator_pio_in(vcpu, size, port, &val, 1);
if (ret) {
kvm_rax_write(vcpu, val);
return ret;
--
2.31.1
