On Mon, 30 May 2022 12:07:43 +0200
Nico Boehr <nrb@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-04-14 at 10:03 +0200, Claudio Imbrenda wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
> > index e358b8bd864b..43393568f844 100644
> > --- a/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
> > +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/uv.c
> > @@ -236,7 +236,8 @@ static int make_secure_pte(pte_t *ptep, unsigned
> > long addr,
> >
> > static bool should_export_before_import(struct uv_cb_header *uvcb,
> > struct mm_struct *mm)
> > {
> > - return uvcb->cmd != UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED &&
> > + return !test_bit_inv(BIT_UV_FEAT_MISC,
> > &uv_info.uv_feature_indications) &&
> > + uvcb->cmd != UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED &&
> > atomic_read(&mm->context.protected_count) > 1;
>
> This might be nicer to read like this:
>
> if (test_bit_inv(BIT_UV_FEAT_MISC, &uv_info.uv_feature_indications))
> return false;
>
> if (uvcb->cmd == UVC_CMD_UNPIN_PAGE_SHARED)
> return false;
>
> return atomic_read(&mm->context.protected_count) > 1;
fair enough
then I'll also fix patch 6 in a similar way, the function is first
introduced there
